Fragility Multi-Center Retrospective Study ------------------------------------------ This dataset was updated and prepared for release as part of a manuscript by Bernabei & Li et al. (in preparation). A subset of the data has been featured in [1]. Summary ------------- iEEG and EEG data from 5 centers is organized in our study with a total of 100 subjects. We publish 4 centers' dataset here due to data sharing issues. Acquisitions include ECoG and SEEG. Each run specifies a different snapshot of EEG data from that specific subject's session. For seizure sessions, this means that each run is a EEG snapshot around a different seizure event. For additional clinical metadata about each subject, refer to the clinical Excel table in the publication. Data Availability ---------------------- NIH, JHH, UMMC, and UMF agreed to share. Cleveland Clinic did not, so requires an additional DUA. All data, except for Cleveland Clinic was approved by their centers to be de-identified and shared. All data in this dataset have no PHI, or other identifiers associated with patient. In order to access Cleveland Clinic data, please forward all requests to Amber Sours, SOURSA@ccf.org: Amber Sours, MPH Research Supervisor | Epilepsy Center Cleveland Clinic | 9500 Euclid Ave. S3-399 | Cleveland, OH 44195 (216) 444-8638 You will need to sign a data use agreement (DUA). Sourcedata ---------------- For each subject, there was a raw EDF file, which was converted into the BrainVision format with `mne_bids`. Each subject with SEEG implantation from Cleveland Clinic, also has an Excel table, called `electrode_layout.xlsx`, which outlines where the clinicians marked each electrode anatomically. Note that there is no rigorous atlas applied, so the main points of interest are: `WM`, `GM`, `VENTRICLE`, `CSF`, and `OUT`, which represent white-matter, gray-matter, ventricle, cerebrospinal fluid and outside the brain. WM, Ventricle, CSF and OUT were removed channels from further analysis. These were labeled in the corresponding BIDS `channels.tsv` sidecar file as `status=bad`. The dataset uploaded to `openneuro.org` does not contain the `sourcedata` since there was an extra anonymization step that occurred when fully converting to BIDS. Derivatives ---------------- Derivatives include: * fragility analysis * frequency analysis * graph metrics analysis * figures These can be computed by following the following paper: [Neural Fragility as an EEG Marker for the Seizure Onset Zone](https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/862797v3) Channel locations in (x,y,z) coordinates -------------------------------------------------------- Unfortunately, the necessary T1 MRI, and CT scans to estimate these were not collected/processed, and exact channel locations are not available for any subject in this dataset as of 09/05/2023. The approximate brain regions of the hypothesized epileptic regions are stated in the metadata and paper. Events and Descriptions ----------------------------------- Within each EDF file, there contain event markers that are annotated by clinicians, which may inform you of specific clinical events that are occuring in time, or of when they saw seizures onset and offset (clinical and electrographic). During a seizure event, specifically event markers may follow this time course: * eeg onset, or clinical onset - the onset of a seizure that is either marked electrographically, or by clinical behavior. Note that the clinical onset may not always be present, since some seizures manifest without clinical behavioral changes. * Marker/Mark On - these are usually annotations within some cases, where a health practitioner injects a chemical marker for use in ICTAL SPECT imaging after a seizure occurs. This is commonly done to see which portions of the brain are active metabolically. * Marker/Mark Off - This is when the ICTAL SPECT stops imaging. * eeg offset, or clinical offset - this is the offset of the seizure, as determined either electrographically, or by clinical symptoms. Other events included may be beneficial for you to understand the time-course of each seizure. Note that ICTAL SPECT occurs in all Cleveland Clinic data. Note that seizure markers are not consistent in their description naming, so one might encode some specific regular-expression rules to consistently capture seizure onset/offset markers across all dataset. In the case of UMMC data, all onset and offset markers were provided by the clinicians on an Excel sheet instead of via the EDF file. So we went in and added the annotations manually to each EDF file. Seizure Electrographic and Clinical Onset Annotations ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- For various datasets, there are seizures present within the dataset. Generally there is only one seizure per EDF file. When seizures are present, they are marked electrographically (and clinically if present) via standard approaches in the epilepsy clinical workflow. Clinical onset are just manifestation of the seizures with clinical syndromes. Sometimes the maker may not be present. Seizure Onset Zone Annotations ----------------------------------------------- What is actually important in the evaluation of datasets is the clinical annotations of their localization hypotheses of the seizure onset zone. These generally include: * early onset: the earliest onset electrodes participating in the seizure that clinicians saw * early/late spread (optional): the electrodes that showed epileptic spread activity after seizure onset. Not all seizures has spread contacts annotated. Surgical Zone (Resection or Ablation) Annotations ----------------------------------------------------------------------- For patients with the post-surgical MRI available, then the segmentation process outlined above tells us which electrodes were within the surgical removed brain region. Otherwise, clinicians give us their best estimate, of which electrodes were resected/ablated based on their surgical notes. For surgical patients whose postoperative medical records did not explicitly indicate specific resected or ablated contacts, manual visual inspection was performed to determine the approximate contacts that were located in later resected/ablated tissue. Postoperative T1 MRI scans were compared against post-SEEG implantation CT scans or CURRY coregistrations of preoperative MRI/post SEEG CT scans. Contacts of interest in and around the area of the reported resection were selected individually and the corresponding slice was navigated to on the CT scan or CURRY coregistration. After identifying landmarks of that slice (e.g. skull shape, skull features, shape of prominent brain structures like the ventricles, central sulcus, superior temporal gyrus, etc.), the location of a given contact in relation to these landmarks, and the location of the slice along the axial plane, the corresponding slice in the postoperative MRI scan was navigated to. The resected tissue within the slice was then visually inspected and compared against the distinct landmarks identified in the CT scans, if brain tissue was not present in the corresponding location of the contact, then the contact was marked as resected/ablated. This process was repeated for each contact of interest. References ----------------- [1] Adam Li, Chester Huynh, Zachary Fitzgerald, Iahn Cajigas, Damian Brusko, Jonathan Jagid, Angel Claudio, Andres Kanner, Jennifer Hopp, Stephanie Chen, Jennifer Haagensen, Emily Johnson, William Anderson, Nathan Crone, Sara Inati, Kareem Zaghloul, Juan Bulacio, Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez, Sridevi V. Sarma. Neural Fragility as an EEG Marker of the Seizure Onset Zone. bioRxiv 862797; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/862797 [2] Appelhoff, S., Sanderson, M., Brooks, T., Vliet, M., Quentin, R., Holdgraf, C., Chaumon, M., Mikulan, E., Tavabi, K., Höchenberger, R., Welke, D., Brunner, C., Rockhill, A., Larson, E., Gramfort, A. and Jas, M. (2019). MNE-BIDS: Organizing electrophysiological data into the BIDS format and facilitating their analysis. Journal of Open Source Software 4: (1896). https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01896 [3] Holdgraf, C., Appelhoff, S., Bickel, S., Bouchard, K., D'Ambrosio, S., David, O., … Hermes, D. (2019). iEEG-BIDS, extending the Brain Imaging Data Structure specification to human intracranial electrophysiology. Scientific Data, 6, 102. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0105-7 [4] Pernet, C. R., Appelhoff, S., Gorgolewski, K. J., Flandin, G., Phillips, C., Delorme, A., Oostenveld, R. (2019). EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography. Scientific Data, 6, 103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0104-8